Saturday, March 26, 2011

She's A Witch but Fortunately She's Not a Bridger



For the benefit of Pirate Christian parrots that may be reading stuff on this blog; some Monty Python humor.

Martin Bashir Isn't A Bridger?



Per this blog posting; Martin Bashir is not a bridger.

Chris Rosebrough's Letter to Jason Coyle of "Ever A Burr-ean" Blog



Jason,

I have real heretics and real false teachers that I need to spend my time warning the church about. I've already publicly laid out what the Biblical doctrine of Unity and Separation is on my radio program and I stand by that teaching. Furthermore, I stand by the fact that neither Dr. Horton nor myself have run afoul of what the Bible actually forbids regarding Unity and Separation regardless of what a few deeply misguided and misinformed people have written on their blogs.

If you and Paula want to spend your time warning the church about orthodox proclaimers and defenders of the Biblical Gospel because you believe their guilty of not abiding by the doctrines of primary or secondary separation and if you want to adopt Ingrid's newly discovered rank in the army of Satan known as the "Bridger" or spend your weekends slaying windmills, then go ahead. Like I said, anyone who claims to have the gift of discernment but cannot properly identify friend and foe needs to take up a different career.

But, while you're warning the church about men like Michael Horton and myself, Dr. Horton and I will be warning the Body of Christ about the real threats that she's facing and equipping her to stand against her real enemies with real Biblical doctrine that centers on Christ and Him crucified for our sins. And when permitted, will even challenge the false doctrines and teachings of heretics to their faces and call them to repentance in their presence or in a personal conversation, knowing that heresy is not spread through casual contact nor does conversing privately or publicly with a heretic make one 'unclean' or a partaker in their heresies, nor does the Bible forbid a Christian to do that. In fact, the balanced Biblical view is found in 2 Thessalonians 3:13–15 which states:

“As for you, brothers, do not grow weary in doing good. If anyone does not obey what we say in this letter, take note of that person, and have nothing to do with him, that he may be ashamed. Do not regard him as an enemy, but warn him as a brother.
The correct Biblical understanding of separation informs us that we are to do 2 things when it comes dealing with heretics and false teachers.

  1. Have nothing to do with the person who doesn't abide in sound doctrine (this is referring to church fellowship not casual contact. How do I know? See point 2)
  2. Warn him as a brother (this is impossible to do if "having nothing to do with him" means we can't even have a conversation with that person. (conversation ≠ church fellowship)
Conversing with with a heretic is not a sin. But lying about a brother and gossiping and slandering is.

Chris

Beware the Bridgers by Ingrid Schlueter

Beware the Bridgers

The role of the Bridger is that of the Judas Goat, famed for attracting sheep to slaughter. The Judas Goat is not the actual  instrument of death. It attracts the sheep to the place where it will be slaughtered. So while a Bridger will not stand in a church and teach from his pulpit or at conferences that there is no literal hell or that the substitutionary penal atonement of Christ was Divine child abuse, he will favorably quote from the books of those who do teach that. Or he might ask a Wolf to endorse his latest book on the back.

The Bridger will speak at conferences with these same Wolves and have photos taken with them. He will quote, selectively, from the Wolves and throw in the qualifier that he "doesn't agree with everything the guy teaches or writes", but he has found so and so's book on leadership really helpful.

When you go to the Bridger's website, however, and click on his doctrinal statement, confusion begins. The Bridger is Trinitarian. He believes in salvation through the work of Christ on the cross. He believes we all have sin. He believes in God's grace. He ascribes to the Apostle's Creed. The Bridger doesn't fit on the heterodoxy chart. He must be OK after all.

This is increasingly the way error is disseminated. Flagrant heretics like Brian McLaren are not difficult to spot. His open denial of cardinal doctrine raises red flares to anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of Scripture and belief in its authority. The enemy of souls is not so stupid as carry error forward only on the backs of the ravening Wolves. He needs the Bridgers. He helps them find useful dupes among Christian apologetics leaders whose egos are flattered by a sense of importance in being chosen to "dialog" with a them. Chummy photos are taken. Credit is given where none is deserved. Warm handshakes occur, private late night phone calls are exchanged, remarks are made over coffee…and another Bridger is given credibility publicly, successfully providing a gateway to error for those who are taken in.

I believe that just as believers are called to specific jobs in the church, the enemy of souls has assigned jobs to those in the hierarchy of spiritual darkness. There are high level roles and less visible roles. The end result for which they work is the same: the destruction of the biblical Gospel and the promotion of a spirituality that is anti-christ.

We cannot afford to be naive in this hour of growing spiritual delusion. We who are believers in Jesus Christ and who hold fast to the bedrock truths of Scripture cannot afford to give an inch to the Bridgers. Satan works in the area of pride and Christian leaders who have not checked that impulse in their hearts and who lust after credibility as  bloggers, apologists, speakers, authors or teachers can unwittingly become the dupes of the Bridgers.

In the book of Nehemiah, we see the response recorded when Sanballot and Tobiah came to "dialog" with God's people. Several times they sought to stop the work of wall building that was underway. The response sent back by Nehemiah to the troublemakers down below was short and clear: "We are building a wall. We cannot come down."

That must be the response of bloggers, podcasters, radio broadcasters and authors when they are invited to "dialog" about spiritual things with emerging church teachers. Truth is not to be debated with false teachers, it is to be proclaimed. That is our role, like the Apostles of old, in the the middle of this encircling spiritual darkness. May God keep all of us faithful.


Distributed by www.worldviewweekend.com 




On Mar 13, 2011, at 12:52, Chris Rosebrough wrote:
Jason,

I've read and reread your proposal and appreciate what you are trying to accomplish. That being said, despite my willingness to discuss this topic with you, because you've requested that certain topics that I believe are central to issue at hand be considered outside of the scope of our conversation, I cannot agree participate in the discussion. The topics that you've stated should be outside of the scope of our discussion are:

  • Whether Ingrid (or others) have applied the term to people wrongly
  • Whether the term itself is reasonable and worth using
  • Any comments on the way you (or others) have criticized the term or those who have used it
Since I have been clear from the start that it is my firm contention that Ingrid is the one who coined the term Bridger, it would simply be impossible for me to properly discuss this topic without referencing:
  • Ingrid's publicly stated definition(s) and use of the term Bridger 
  • Who is a Bridger according to Ingrid's definition(s) 
  • The unbiblical standard of evidence employed by Ingrid in determining who is a Bridger 
    • Ingrid's use of the informal logical fallacy, Guilt by Association in order to brand Christian leaders as Bridgers
    • How Ingrid's failure to provide proper evidence in context and her use of logical fallacies has resulted in a witch hunt mentality that casts suspicion on leaders in the church who actually believe, teach, confess and defend the Biblical gospel.
  • Ingrid's publicly stated prescription for protecting the Body of Christ from Bridgers. 
Therefore, I will not agree to any discussion on this topic that restricts me from putting forward what I believe the problem is and providing the supporting evidence needed to defend my thesis.

I do not believe that a dialogue, no matter how amicably handled, that is limited to some abstract discussion of the concept of Bridger, detached from the context of current events will help the cause of truth or unity.

Chris

Beware the Bridgers Part 1 - Recovered from Google Save

November 16, 2010

Beware the Bridgers Part 1: Orthodoxy is More Than a Doctrinal Statement

Host:Ingrid Schlueter
Guest:Deborah Dombrowski
Listen:RealAudio | Windows Media | MP3 | Order Tape or CD

To listen we recommend Windows Media,
RealAudio, Winamp, or QuickTime players.
Deborah Dombrowski is the Editor in Chief for Lighthouse Trails Publishing.

This Crosstalk looks at Dan Kimball, an author and pastor who has been part of the emerging church movement since its beginnings with Leadership Network.

Dan Kimball has an orthodox doctrinal statement, yet he continues to participate with the major false teachers of the emergent church movement. Is an orthodox doctrinal statement enough when assessing the truth of a spiritual leader? How can someone who claims an orthodox doctrinal statement participate with, fellowship with and point others to those teaching doctrines of demons? Should biblical Christian leaders "dialog" with emergent leaders? These questions are addressed in part one of this two-day series on Bridgers - teachers who work to bridge the gap between biblical Christianity and the mystical doctrines of contemplative spirituality.


More Information
http://www.lighthousetrailsresearch.com
http://www.lighthousetrails.com

To obtain a copy of the book, A Wonderful Deception by Warren Smith for a donation of $18 or more:

Crosstalk
3434 West Kilbourn Avenue
Milwaukee, WI 53214
1-800-729-9829 M-F 8am-5pm Central
Order the book online

To order today's program on CD or Cassette for a donation of $6.00
Online: Use the link at the top of this entry
By mail:
Crosstalk
3434 W. Kilbourn Ave.
Milwaukee, WI 53208
By phone: 1-800-729-9829 M-F 8am-5pm Central

Chris Rosebrough and Bill Hybels Promotes Dan Kimball

Dan Kimball

Got the idea for this blog title from a YouTube video linked below:



Chris Rosebrough loves guilt by association when it works in his favor?

Museum of Idolatry? East of Eden


Per my understanding, this is Chris Rosebrough's favorite James Dean movie.  Chris sort of worships this movie?  Frankly, I prefer....


RIP: Elizabeth Taylor